What should a task cost?
Search a task shape, get a reasonable budget — dollars per task, tokens where published — distilled from lab benchmarks. Community reports refine these bands as they accumulate, and outrank them wherever a cell reaches n ≥ 5.
Cents per task — $0.01 to $0.10 for a frontier model on a self-contained change.
Based on Aider polyglot suite totals ÷ 225 exercises: $0.006–$0.08 per exercise across frontier models. Exercises arrive with tests and no repository context; real XS–S tasks in a live repo run higher with harness overhead.
Budget a few dollars per attempt; $0.10 with cheap models, $30+ at max reasoning effort.
Based on SWE-bench per-task costs on the Verified and Multilingual splits ($0.05–$0.36 on efficient models, higher with reasoning effort) and HAL's cross-agent range of $0.08–$32 per SWE-bench Verified task. Benchmark bugs come pre-scoped with a failing test; finding and scoping your bug is extra — and failed attempts cost the same as successes.
Roughly $10–$20 and 35k–65k tokens for one serious agentic pass at high effort.
Based on CursorBench per-task cost and token counts at three reasoning-effort levels. A single benchmark under agent-run conditions — one calibrated anchor, not a market rate.
Unattended agent campaigns reach $1,500–$3,900 and 8M–57M tokens — the ceiling to plan against, not the typical case.
Based on Complete autonomous eval runs: OSWorld 2 full-run costs and GBAEval total token consumption. These are entire eval campaigns. A supervised multi-day task usually lands far below this ceiling — but an overnight fleet can genuinely hit it.
Thirty cents to a few dollars for one genuinely hard single-shot problem.
Based on ARC-AGI and WeirdML per-problem costs across frontier models. Puzzle-style tasks — closest to one tough chat question, not a workflow.
Lab conditions differ from yours: benchmark tasks arrive pre-scoped, and real spend adds harness overhead, context, and iteration — treat bands as calibration, not quotes. Failed attempts cost the same as successful ones.
The evidence
Every band above is distilled from the rows below — expand a question to see the underlying published figures.
What does a small, well-specified coding exercise cost? (15 rows)
Frontier models clear small standalone exercises for cents each — the whole 225-exercise Aider suite runs $6–$60 depending on model and reasoning effort.
These are self-contained exercises with tests provided — no repository context, no harness overhead, no iteration with a human.
| Model / setup | Published figure | Per task | As of |
|---|---|---|---|
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp (Reasoner) | $1.30 (pass rate 74.2%) | ≈ $0.006/exercise | 2025-10-03 |
DeepSeek R1 (0528) | $4.80 (pass rate 71.4%) | ≈ $0.02/exercise | 2025-06-06 |
gpt-5 (low) | $10.37 (pass rate 81.3%) | ≈ $0.05/exercise | 2025-08-25 |
o3 | $13.75 (pass rate 76.9%) | ≈ $0.06/exercise | 2025-06-25 |
o3 (high) + gpt-4.1 | $17.55 (pass rate 78.2%) | ≈ $0.08/exercise | 2025-06-27 |
gpt-5 (medium) | $17.69 (pass rate 86.7%) | ≈ $0.08/exercise | 2025-08-25 |
Show all 15 rows
o4-mini (high) | $19.64 (pass rate 72.0%) | ≈ $0.09/exercise | 2025-04-16 |
o3 (high) | $21.23 (pass rate 81.3%) | ≈ $0.09/exercise | 2025-06-25 |
gpt-5 (high) | $29.08 (pass rate 88.0%) | ≈ $0.13/exercise | 2025-08-23 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 | $37.41 (pass rate 76.9%) | ≈ $0.17/exercise | 2025-05-07 |
gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05 (default think) | $45.60 (pass rate 79.1%) | ≈ $0.20/exercise | 2025-06-06 |
gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05 (32k think) | $49.88 (pass rate 83.1%) | ≈ $0.22/exercise | 2025-06-06 |
grok-4 (high) | $59.62 (pass rate 79.6%) | ≈ $0.26/exercise | 2025-07-11 |
claude-opus-4-20250514 (32k thinking) | $65.75 (pass rate 72.0%) | ≈ $0.29/exercise | 2025-05-25 |
o3-pro (high) | $146.32 (pass rate 84.9%) | ≈ $0.65/exercise | 2025-06-28 |
Aider polyglot leaderboard · retrieved 2026-09-15
What does fixing a real repository bug cost an agent? (29 rows)
Lab agents resolve roughly a third to two-thirds of real GitHub issues at an average of a few dollars per attempt; per-task costs stretch from under $0.10 to $30+ by model and effort.
SWE-bench tasks come pre-scoped with a failing test — your bug also needs finding and scoping, which is where real harness spend goes.
| Model / setup | Published figure | As of |
|---|---|---|
GPT 5 mini | $0.05 at 39.7% resolved | 2026-02-13 |
MiniMax M2.5 (high) | $0.07 at 75.8% resolved | 2026-02-17 |
MiniMax M2.5 | $0.10 at 68.3% resolved | 2026-02-16 |
Kimi K2.5 (high) | $0.15 at 70.8% resolved | 2026-02-17 |
Gemini 3 Flash | $0.35 at 72.7% resolved | 2026-02-13 |
Gemini 3 Flash (high) | $0.36 at 75.8% resolved | 2026-02-17 |
Show all 29 rows
Claude 4.5 Haiku | $0.38 at 64.7% resolved | 2026-02-13 |
DeepSeek V3.2 | $0.38 at 59.0% resolved | 2026-02-13 |
GPT 5.2 Codex | $0.45 at 72.8% resolved | 2026-02-19 |
DeepSeek V3.2 (high) | $0.45 at 70.0% resolved | 2026-02-17 |
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (2025-11-18) | $0.46 at 74.2% resolved | 2025-11-18 |
GPT 5.2 (high) | $0.47 at 72.8% resolved | 2026-02-17 |
GPT 5.2 (2025-12-11) (high) | $0.52 at 71.8% resolved | 2025-12-11 |
GLM 5 (high) | $0.53 at 72.8% resolved | 2026-02-17 |
GPT 5.2 (high) | $0.54 at 66.7% resolved | 2026-02-13 |
Claude 4.6 Opus | $0.55 at 75.6% resolved | 2026-02-17 |
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (20250929) | $0.56 at 70.6% resolved | 2025-09-29 |
GLM 5 | $0.64 at 69.7% resolved | 2026-02-13 |
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (high) | $0.66 at 71.4% resolved | 2026-02-17 |
Claude 4.6 Opus | $0.66 at 72.0% resolved | 2026-02-13 |
GPT 5.2 Codex | $0.66 at 66.3% resolved | 2026-02-20 |
Claude 4.5 Sonnet | $0.67 at 67.0% resolved | 2026-02-13 |
Kimi K2.5 | $0.69 at 67.3% resolved | 2026-02-13 |
Claude 4.5 Opus (20251101) (medium) | $0.72 at 74.4% resolved | 2025-11-24 |
Claude 4.5 Opus (high) | $0.75 at 76.8% resolved | 2026-02-17 |
Claude 4.5 Opus | $0.83 at 70.7% resolved | 2026-02-13 |
Gemini 3 Pro | $0.96 at 69.6% resolved | 2026-02-26 |
Gemini 3 Pro | $1.02 at 68.7% resolved | 2026-02-13 |
cross-model | $163 median per run; $0.08–$32.00 per task | 2026-07-01 |
SWE-bench (Multilingual split) · SWE-bench (Verified split) · HAL — Holistic Agent Leaderboard (Princeton) · retrieved 2026-09-15
What does an agentic feature pass in an IDE-style harness cost? (3 rows)
A serious agentic coding pass lands around $10–$20 and 35k–65k tokens per task at high reasoning effort.
Single benchmark (CursorBench), agent-run conditions — treat as one calibrated anchor, not a market rate.
| Model / setup | Published figure | As of |
|---|---|---|
Grok 4.6 Extra High | $2.81, 41.1k tokens/task | 2026-08-12 |
Fable 5.1 Extra High | $6.96, 51.3k tokens/task | 2026-09-01 |
Fable 5.1 Max | $9.64, 72.1k tokens/task | 2026-09-01 |
Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub · retrieved 2026-09-15
What do long autonomous agent runs burn? (6 rows)
Full autonomous evaluations consume 8M–57M tokens, and complete computer-use runs cost $1,500–$3,900 — the honest ceiling case for overnight fleets.
These are entire eval campaigns, not single tasks — the point is the order of magnitude an unattended agent can reach.
| Model / setup | Published figure | As of |
|---|---|---|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (medium) | $1550.00 | 2026-02-17 |
GPT-5.5 (xhigh) | $2750.00 | 2026-04-23 |
Claude Opus 4.7 (max) | $3870.00 | 2026-04-16 |
Claude Opus 5 | 8.71M tokens | 2026-07-26 |
Claude Fable 5 | 41.71M tokens | 2026-06-10 |
Claude Opus 4.8 | 57.08M tokens | 2026-05-30 |
Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub · retrieved 2026-09-15
What does one hard reasoning problem cost? (6 rows)
One hard reasoning or ML problem runs from about thirty cents to a few dollars.
Puzzle-style benchmarks — closest to a single tough question in a chat, not a workflow.
| Model / setup | Published figure | As of |
|---|---|---|
GPT-5.6 Sol (High) | $0.30 | 2026-07-09 |
GPT-5.6 Sol (xHigh) | $0.40 | 2026-07-09 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) | $0.52 | 2026-02-19 |
gpt-6-astra_high | $2.98 | 2026-09-03 |
claude-fable-5-1_high | $3.20 | 2026-09-01 |
claude-fable-5-1_max | $11.69 | 2026-09-01 |
Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub · retrieved 2026-09-15
Which models buy the most capability per dollar?
Model-level context, not task cost: intelligence score against blended list price.
Claude Fable 5.1 Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback | 53.4 | $20.00 |
Claude Opus 5 Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort | 50.7 | $10.00 |
Claude Fable 5 Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback | 49.7 | $20.00 |
Muse Spark 1.3 max | 48.2 | $2.00 |
GPT-5.6 Sol max | 47.1 | $8.00 |
GLM-5.3 max | 44.9 | $2.15 |
Grok 4.6 high | 44.4 | $3.00 |
Kimi K3 max | 43.8 | $6.00 |
GPT-5.6 Terra max | 42.3 | $4.50 |
Claude Opus 4.8 Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort | 42.0 | $10.00 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash high | 41.2 | $1.50 |
Claude Opus 4.7 Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort | 40.7 | $10.00 |
Qwen3.8 Max | 40.3 | $3.00 |
Gemini 3.7 Flash high | 39.4 | $1.50 |
Claude Sonnet 5 Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort | 38.4 | $4.00 |
GPT-5.6 Luna max | 37.5 | $0.45 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash high | 34.3 | $1.50 |
GPT-5 high | 23.0 | $3.44 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro | 16.7 | $3.44 |
Claude 4.5 Haiku Non-reasoning | 15.4 | $2.00 |
Source: Artificial Analysis — displayed with attribution per their Data API terms · retrieved 2026-09-15
Sources, licenses, staleness policy, and how bands are distilled: methodology. Reference data retrieved 2026-09-15.