TokensBenchReport your cost

What should a task cost?

Search a task shape, get a reasonable budget — dollars per task, tokens where published — distilled from lab benchmarks. Community reports refine these bands as they accumulate, and outrank them wherever a cell reaches n ≥ 5.

Small, well-specified coding task (XS–S)
$0.01–$0.10 / tasktypically $0.05

Cents per task — $0.01 to $0.10 for a frontier model on a self-contained change.

Based on Aider polyglot suite totals ÷ 225 exercises: $0.006–$0.08 per exercise across frontier models. Exercises arrive with tests and no repository context; real XS–S tasks in a live repo run higher with harness overhead.

Real-repository bug fix (M)
$0.10–$30 / tasktypically $3

Budget a few dollars per attempt; $0.10 with cheap models, $30+ at max reasoning effort.

Based on SWE-bench per-task costs on the Verified and Multilingual splits ($0.05–$0.36 on efficient models, higher with reasoning effort) and HAL's cross-agent range of $0.08–$32 per SWE-bench Verified task. Benchmark bugs come pre-scoped with a failing test; finding and scoping your bug is extra — and failed attempts cost the same as successes.

Agentic feature or refactor pass (M)
$10–$20 / tasktypically $14· 37k–64k tokens

Roughly $10–$20 and 35k–65k tokens for one serious agentic pass at high effort.

Based on CursorBench per-task cost and token counts at three reasoning-effort levels. A single benchmark under agent-run conditions — one calibrated anchor, not a market rate.

single benchmark — one calibrated anchorCommunity reports: feature · M →
Long autonomous agent effort (L–XL)
$1,500–$3,900 / full run· 8M–57M tokens

Unattended agent campaigns reach $1,500–$3,900 and 8M–57M tokens — the ceiling to plan against, not the typical case.

Based on Complete autonomous eval runs: OSWorld 2 full-run costs and GBAEval total token consumption. These are entire eval campaigns. A supervised multi-day task usually lands far below this ceiling — but an overnight fleet can genuinely hit it.

ceiling reference, not a typical caseModel an org budget with this ceiling →
One hard reasoning problem (single-shot)
$0.30–$9 / tasktypically $2

Thirty cents to a few dollars for one genuinely hard single-shot problem.

Based on ARC-AGI and WeirdML per-problem costs across frontier models. Puzzle-style tasks — closest to one tough chat question, not a workflow.

multiple sources agreeAsk about your task shape →

Lab conditions differ from yours: benchmark tasks arrive pre-scoped, and real spend adds harness overhead, context, and iteration — treat bands as calibration, not quotes. Failed attempts cost the same as successful ones.

The evidence

Every band above is distilled from the rows below — expand a question to see the underlying published figures.

What does a small, well-specified coding exercise cost? (15 rows)

Frontier models clear small standalone exercises for cents each — the whole 225-exercise Aider suite runs $6–$60 depending on model and reasoning effort.

These are self-contained exercises with tests provided — no repository context, no harness overhead, no iteration with a human.

Model / setupPublished figurePer taskAs of
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp (Reasoner)
$1.30 (pass rate 74.2%)≈ $0.006/exercise2025-10-03
DeepSeek R1 (0528)
$4.80 (pass rate 71.4%)≈ $0.02/exercise2025-06-06
gpt-5 (low)
$10.37 (pass rate 81.3%)≈ $0.05/exercise2025-08-25
o3
$13.75 (pass rate 76.9%)≈ $0.06/exercise2025-06-25
o3 (high) + gpt-4.1
$17.55 (pass rate 78.2%)≈ $0.08/exercise2025-06-27
gpt-5 (medium)
$17.69 (pass rate 86.7%)≈ $0.08/exercise2025-08-25
Show all 15 rows
o4-mini (high)
$19.64 (pass rate 72.0%)≈ $0.09/exercise2025-04-16
o3 (high)
$21.23 (pass rate 81.3%)≈ $0.09/exercise2025-06-25
gpt-5 (high)
$29.08 (pass rate 88.0%)≈ $0.13/exercise2025-08-23
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06
$37.41 (pass rate 76.9%)≈ $0.17/exercise2025-05-07
gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05 (default think)
$45.60 (pass rate 79.1%)≈ $0.20/exercise2025-06-06
gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05 (32k think)
$49.88 (pass rate 83.1%)≈ $0.22/exercise2025-06-06
grok-4 (high)
$59.62 (pass rate 79.6%)≈ $0.26/exercise2025-07-11
claude-opus-4-20250514 (32k thinking)
$65.75 (pass rate 72.0%)≈ $0.29/exercise2025-05-25
o3-pro (high)
$146.32 (pass rate 84.9%)≈ $0.65/exercise2025-06-28

Aider polyglot leaderboard · retrieved 2026-09-15

What does fixing a real repository bug cost an agent? (29 rows)

Lab agents resolve roughly a third to two-thirds of real GitHub issues at an average of a few dollars per attempt; per-task costs stretch from under $0.10 to $30+ by model and effort.

SWE-bench tasks come pre-scoped with a failing test — your bug also needs finding and scoping, which is where real harness spend goes.

Model / setupPublished figureAs of
GPT 5 mini
$0.05 at 39.7% resolved2026-02-13
MiniMax M2.5 (high)
$0.07 at 75.8% resolved2026-02-17
MiniMax M2.5
$0.10 at 68.3% resolved2026-02-16
Kimi K2.5 (high)
$0.15 at 70.8% resolved2026-02-17
Gemini 3 Flash
$0.35 at 72.7% resolved2026-02-13
Gemini 3 Flash (high)
$0.36 at 75.8% resolved2026-02-17
Show all 29 rows
Claude 4.5 Haiku
$0.38 at 64.7% resolved2026-02-13
DeepSeek V3.2
$0.38 at 59.0% resolved2026-02-13
GPT 5.2 Codex
$0.45 at 72.8% resolved2026-02-19
DeepSeek V3.2 (high)
$0.45 at 70.0% resolved2026-02-17
Gemini 3 Pro Preview (2025-11-18)
$0.46 at 74.2% resolved2025-11-18
GPT 5.2 (high)
$0.47 at 72.8% resolved2026-02-17
GPT 5.2 (2025-12-11) (high)
$0.52 at 71.8% resolved2025-12-11
GLM 5 (high)
$0.53 at 72.8% resolved2026-02-17
GPT 5.2 (high)
$0.54 at 66.7% resolved2026-02-13
Claude 4.6 Opus
$0.55 at 75.6% resolved2026-02-17
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (20250929)
$0.56 at 70.6% resolved2025-09-29
GLM 5
$0.64 at 69.7% resolved2026-02-13
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (high)
$0.66 at 71.4% resolved2026-02-17
Claude 4.6 Opus
$0.66 at 72.0% resolved2026-02-13
GPT 5.2 Codex
$0.66 at 66.3% resolved2026-02-20
Claude 4.5 Sonnet
$0.67 at 67.0% resolved2026-02-13
Kimi K2.5
$0.69 at 67.3% resolved2026-02-13
Claude 4.5 Opus (20251101) (medium)
$0.72 at 74.4% resolved2025-11-24
Claude 4.5 Opus (high)
$0.75 at 76.8% resolved2026-02-17
Claude 4.5 Opus
$0.83 at 70.7% resolved2026-02-13
Gemini 3 Pro
$0.96 at 69.6% resolved2026-02-26
Gemini 3 Pro
$1.02 at 68.7% resolved2026-02-13
cross-model
$163 median per run; $0.08–$32.00 per task2026-07-01

SWE-bench (Multilingual split) · SWE-bench (Verified split) · HAL — Holistic Agent Leaderboard (Princeton) · retrieved 2026-09-15

What does an agentic feature pass in an IDE-style harness cost? (3 rows)

A serious agentic coding pass lands around $10–$20 and 35k–65k tokens per task at high reasoning effort.

Single benchmark (CursorBench), agent-run conditions — treat as one calibrated anchor, not a market rate.

Model / setupPublished figureAs of
Grok 4.6 Extra High
$2.81, 41.1k tokens/task2026-08-12
Fable 5.1 Extra High
$6.96, 51.3k tokens/task2026-09-01
Fable 5.1 Max
$9.64, 72.1k tokens/task2026-09-01

Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub · retrieved 2026-09-15

What do long autonomous agent runs burn? (6 rows)

Full autonomous evaluations consume 8M–57M tokens, and complete computer-use runs cost $1,500–$3,900 — the honest ceiling case for overnight fleets.

These are entire eval campaigns, not single tasks — the point is the order of magnitude an unattended agent can reach.

Model / setupPublished figureAs of
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (medium)
$1550.002026-02-17
GPT-5.5 (xhigh)
$2750.002026-04-23
Claude Opus 4.7 (max)
$3870.002026-04-16
Claude Opus 5
8.71M tokens2026-07-26
Claude Fable 5
41.71M tokens2026-06-10
Claude Opus 4.8
57.08M tokens2026-05-30

Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub · retrieved 2026-09-15

What does one hard reasoning problem cost? (6 rows)

One hard reasoning or ML problem runs from about thirty cents to a few dollars.

Puzzle-style benchmarks — closest to a single tough question in a chat, not a workflow.

Model / setupPublished figureAs of
GPT-5.6 Sol (High)
$0.302026-07-09
GPT-5.6 Sol (xHigh)
$0.402026-07-09
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)
$0.522026-02-19
gpt-6-astra_high
$2.982026-09-03
claude-fable-5-1_high
$3.202026-09-01
claude-fable-5-1_max
$11.692026-09-01

Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub · retrieved 2026-09-15

Which models buy the most capability per dollar?

Model-level context, not task cost: intelligence score against blended list price.

Claude Fable 5.1
Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback
53.4$20.00
Claude Opus 5
Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort
50.7$10.00
Claude Fable 5
Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback
49.7$20.00
Muse Spark 1.3
max
48.2$2.00
GPT-5.6 Sol
max
47.1$8.00
GLM-5.3
max
44.9$2.15
Grok 4.6
high
44.4$3.00
Kimi K3
max
43.8$6.00
GPT-5.6 Terra
max
42.3$4.50
Claude Opus 4.8
Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort
42.0$10.00
Gemini 3.8 Flash
high
41.2$1.50
Claude Opus 4.7
Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort
40.7$10.00
Qwen3.8 Max
40.3$3.00
Gemini 3.7 Flash
high
39.4$1.50
Claude Sonnet 5
Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort
38.4$4.00
GPT-5.6 Luna
max
37.5$0.45
Gemini 3.6 Flash
high
34.3$1.50
GPT-5
high
23.0$3.44
Gemini 2.5 Pro
16.7$3.44
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Non-reasoning
15.4$2.00

Source: Artificial Analysis — displayed with attribution per their Data API terms · retrieved 2026-09-15

Sources, licenses, staleness policy, and how bands are distilled: methodology. Reference data retrieved 2026-09-15.