TokensBenchReport your cost

What should AI work cost?

Community-reported task costs, benchmark-anchored pricing, and percentile spend budgets by role — so individuals stop guessing and executives can plan with real numbers.

Early data

Every task type and role can report — coding has the deepest benchmark anchors today, and role budgets are seeded from published references until community-reported cells reach n ≥ 5.

Find your starting point

TokensBench answers a different question depending on who is asking.

Individuals

Am I doing it wrong?

See what people paid for tasks like yours, broken out by model, harness, and technique.

Ask what a task costs →
Executives

What should we budget?

Per-seat monthly bands by role, sourced and exportable — build an AI budget you can defend.

Open the planner →
Teams

How do we compare?

Cross-model, cross-harness cost data by role, checked against benchmark reference points.

Browse roles →

Numbers worth knowing

A few headline figures from the references TokensBench is seeded on.

Median → top 1% monthly AI spend per employee
≈680×
$11.38 → $7,449

Ramp AI Index, June 2026.

Typical per-engineer AI coding spend
$150–600
Reported monthly, per engineer

DX benchmark, 2026.

Cancelled price increase, Sept 2026
$2/$10
Claude Sonnet 5's scheduled step to $3/$15 was withdrawn — introductory pricing became standard

Anthropic pricing page — tracked in our append-only price history.

How it works

Three layers, deterministic math — the LLM never computes a number.

01

Reference layer

Model pricing and benchmark cost-per-task, ingested from authoritative sources like SWE-bench, HAL, and Artificial Analysis — cited, versioned snapshots.

02

Community reports

Real task and period costs submitted by the community, moderated before publishing and weighted by verification.

03

Derived percentiles

Median, IQR, and p90 bands and budget plans, computed deterministically from the two layers above.